Ms. SNIP: Have you been watching the public hearings regarding the impeachment?
Ms. SNIPE: Only part of them. I find amusement in watching the different interpretations from MSNBC and FOX.
Ms. SNIP: Don’t they say pretty much the same thing?
Ms. SNIPE: Where have you been? Way too much difference to even note. Let me give you my interpretation of the testimony of one witness.
Ms. SNIP: I guess people just interpret based on which side they are on.
Ms. SNIPE: That’s one interpretation, yours. It’s possible that one side is right and the other is practicing CYA. Or, the updated version: CTA.
Ms. SNIP: Oh, you mean?
Ms. SNIPE: Yes. It seems a lot of words and phrases have taken on new meaning. CYA has been around a long time. The CTA lends more toward behaving like blind followers or lemmings rushing to cover for the orange BC (Big Crybaby). Other words and word substitutions include:
LIED = Misspoke, forgot;
ILLEGAL = Standard practice, everybody does it;
GOD = $$$$;
DISLIKE = Doesn’t exist;
FREE SPEECH = Free to mock, slander, debase;
TRUTH HURTS = Cancel NYT AND Washington Post.
Ms. SNIP: I have to admit, I do hear a lot of these ‘new phrases’ in place of the older ones.
Ms. SNIPE: To me, the funniest and saddest Q & A from the hearing was when the question was asked about how outrageous something was after a certain event was seen to be outrageous by a participant. I paraphrase the Q: How outrageous was it? Is it possible that there could there be anything more outrageous? A: It’s possible that there could be something more outrageous. My comment: Seems that there could ALWAYS be something more outrageous. If that’s the best question someone can come up with perhaps that someone should be replaced by an outside person with a clearer picture of the focus of the hearing.
Ms. SNIP: Would you like to have an opportunity to question the witnesses?
Ms. SNIPE: Sometimes I think I would. Especially when an obvious follow-up question isn’t asked. I had hoped there would be questions which didn’t expose the obvious bias of the questioner. Some see the gist as the real or imagined misconduct of VP Biden and his son. I understand that was investigated some time ago. But anyway, it has turned up again. Regarding VP Biden, it’s not like he gave his child a place as advisor in the White House while he was doing business and getting foreign patents. Oh, wait, that’s the other guy who did that. Well, at least he didn’t put an in-law in charge of foreign programs even though that in-law had no training or experience in that activity. Oh wait, that’s the other guy as well. I’m pretty sure Biden didn’t hide his tax records and business records. Oh wait – again, other guy.
Ms. SNIP: Pot calling Kettle?
Ms. SNIPE: Again, your interpretation. Which remind me. BC has declared the current administration as ‘the most transparent of any.’ I’ll end with my last example of new word meanings:
TRANSPARENCY: So transparent it can’t even be seen. E.g. taxes, businesses. Charities, debts, foreign ties, etc.